Well our friend Larry Sinclair, if you remember my last blog about this guy, he is one of people spreading outrageous lies about Barack Obama, is in the news again. I suspect he has the IQ of a newt! You see, Sinclair aside from trying to gain more than his 15 minutes of fame, has lots of outstanding warrants against him.
Who, but a certifiable moron, calls a press conference with outstanding warrants in the District of Columbia? He had intended to legitimize his wild stories by telling them to an audience of interested reporters. Instead he stepped before a small group of spectators, all primed for a show.
According to David Weigel of Reason Magazine, Sinclair, his kilt-wearing lawyer (disbarred in DC) and a few other assorted odd, and I really mean odd folks showed up to conduct the conference. Sinclair attempted to answer questions, but failed to keep even the dates and times of his alleged encounters with Senator Obama straight.
Finally he unceremoniously left the room where he was promptly arrested by Washington DC police as a "fugitive from justice".
All in all it sounds like a good side show with the only news worthy event being Sinclair's arrest. Not that I expected anything more.
Worse still was the notice posted about the event which purported to be the "truth about Barack Obama". This was at the National Press Club after all, you would expect at least a little truth about the real nature of the event. Perhaps the notice should have read, "Fugitive Criminal and Pathological Liar Holds Event for Those Easily Amused".
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
3 comments:
Larry did great! Well poised, well dressed, and he showed those obamabots what for!
When the press finally starts listening, there'll be HELL TO PAY!
THEN we'll see who's telling the truth!
It would seem the truth is something Mr. Sinclair has some issues with. Trusted sources for news rarely have a long arrest record and use multiple assumed names. Polygraph tests, though not perfect, are pretty good indicators of veracity.
The press listened and found his arguments sorely lacking in any truth at all.
I find the second sentence of the post offensive, and degrading to newts! In future, please be more respectful of harmless, innocent creatures. Might I suggest as alternative comparison phrases, "bag of hammers", or "box of rocks".
ô¿ô
╘╛
Post a Comment